Confused and Confusing

truce

 

IN HIS first State of the Nation Address (SONA), President Rodrigo Duterte announced a unilateral cease-fire with the Communist Party of the Philippines’ New Peoples’ Army, and the National Democratic Frontof the Philippines (CPP-NPA-NDFP).

Several newspapers ran reports on Duterte’s announcement. However, most of them confused the unilateral cease-fire with a truce. A unilateral cease-fire is declared only by one side in a conflict in preparation for negotiations, while a truce is mutually agreed upon to stop hostilities usually for humanitarian purposes.

Two newspapers ran reports with headlines equating the cease-fire declaration with a truce.  The Philippine Star published “Peace of the living: Truce with Reds declared,” while the Manila Standard also ran a “Duterte declares truce with Reds.”

Two days after the SONA, on July 27, the NPA ambushed a Citizen Armed Forces Geographical Unit (CAFGU), leaving one dead and four others injured. The CPP statement pointed to the military violating the government’s own cease-fire declaration. On July 30, Duterte lifted the cease-fire declaration.

Media reports again reverted to the use of the two terms as meaning the same thing. Surprisingly, some of those who got the terms right in earlier reports made the mistake in subsequent reports, and vice versa.

Hopefully, as the peace process moves forward, the press will be able to use these terms correctly, as confusing their meaning could affect the public’s appreciation of the progress of these efforts.

 

 

The Difference Between a Truce and a Cease-fire

The words truce and cease-fire are usually used interchangeably in media reports and other literature. While these terms have overlapping meanings, they are not synonymous.

The International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) defines a truce as an agreement between conflicting parties to stop hostilities in a certain area during a certain period. It is usually an informal suspension of hostilities carried out to negotiate specific issues such as evacuating casualties or exchange of prisoners. Truces tend to be temporary, but can at times lead to a more permanent cessation of hostilities (“Glossary: Truce,” Casebook.ICRC.org, May 22, 2012).

A cease-fire refers to the immediate effect produced by suspending hostilities (“Glossary: Cease-fire,” Casebook.ICRC.org, May 21, 2012). It is declared either unilaterally (undertaken by only a single side in a conflict), or bilaterally (agreed upon by both sides) usually to prepare for negotiations. It does not however end conflict; it only halts it temporarily (Truce, Cease-Fire and Armistice: The Legal Nuances,” NYTimes.com, February 22, 2016).

 

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *