A conversation on impunity

Written by CMFR on December 1, 2011 – 2:23 pm -

Recording of live Q&A in Vienna on 23 November 2011 with experts who are combating impunity in some of the world’s most dangerous countries to be a journalist.

See if your questions got answered by our esteemed panel of experts:

  • Alison Bethel McKenzie, Executive Director, International Press Institute
  • Andrei Richter, OSCE Representative on Freedom of the Media
  • Andrés Morales, Executive Director, Fundación para la Libertad de Prensa, Colombia
  • Melinda Quintos de Jesus, Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility, Philippines
  • Darío Ramírez, Director, ARTICLE 19 Mexico and Central America

(Moderated by Anthony Mills, IPI Press Freedom Manager and former CNN correspondent)

A turning point and a test

Written by CMFR on November 23, 2011 – 11:21 am -

Statement of the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility
on the second anniversary of the November 23, 2009 Ampatuan Massacre

The international press freedom and media advocacy groups may have designated November 23rd as the International Day to End Impunity. But here in the Philippines, on this, the second anniversary of the foul deed now known as the Ampatuan Massacre, the glacial progress of the trial of those accused of planning and carrying it out has become so much a cause for distress because the possibility that it may drag on for years bodes ill for press freedom, human rights and the quest for justice in Philippine society.

A year ago the pace of the judicial proceedings had already set off alarm bells among journalists’ and media advocacy groups, the kin of those killed, and anyone else who still cared about the future of the free press and democracy in this country.

The Massacre was after all a brutal attack on the free press as an institution necessary in any country with any pretense at democracy, and on the people’s right to choose their leaders.  By murdering 58 men and women, among whom were the lawyers, relatives and allies of a candidate for provincial governor, and 32 journalists and media workers, the killers set back press freedom and free elections by so many years, and earned for the country the dubious distinction of being the site, not only of the worst attack on the press in history, but also of a fraudulent democracy.

Both political and media killings have a long and brutal history in this country. Politicians, their allies and their campaign workers are killed so routinely in the Philippines that every election is always declared peaceful, no matter the casualties.  On the other hand, the Massacre was a crime waiting to happen. The persistence of warlordism, the antipathy of local tyrants towards the press, and the many weaknesses of the justice system made it inevitable.

The Massacre, however, was also a turning point, and a test of the will and capacity of the Philippine State not only to assure the safety of its citizens, but also of its ability to provide them justice.

The journalists and media advocacy groups knew a year ago, and know it even more now, that unless the Massacre trial is credibly concluded, with the killers and masterminds convicted and sentenced to the prison terms they so richly deserve, not only will the killing of journalists and those of  human rights workers, political activists, environmental advocates, judges, lawyers, students, farmers and workers continue; the killings will even escalate.

That distinct possibility makes the Massacre trial so crucial to the life and future of this country. And yet, judging by its laid-back response to, among others, the suggestions for reforms in the rules of court media groups andthe Free Legal Assistance Group of lawyers have proposed, the Philippine government does not seem to be in any hurry to address the urgent concerns—for press freedom, democracy, and the country as a whole—the Massacre has triggered.

This simply won’t do.  The Aquino government must not only take the steps necessary to speed up this trial; it must also demonstrate, when journalists are killed, that it has put in place the means to punish the killers and masterminds. To do nothing or little can only lead to more deaths, adding to the six already killed in the line of duty since Mr. Benigno Aquino III took office.

Self-fulfilling prophecy

Written by CMFR on November 23, 2011 – 10:49 am -

Pooled editorial on the Second anniversary of the November 23, 2009 Ampatuan Massacre

Referring to the extrajudicial killings that were so much a part of the past Arroyo administration, and the killing of journalists that spiked on November 23, 2009, President Benigno Aquino III declared in his 2010 State of the Nation Address (SONA) that his administration would “hold murderers accountable.”

Despite that pledge, six journalists have been killed since then, or a total of ten since the Ampatuan Massacre of November 23, 2009 which claimed the lives of 58 men and women, of whom 32 were journalists and media workers. Dozens of human rights workers, political activists, labor leaders and others have also been abducted, tortured and killed during the same period.

In addition to the killings that have continued in the Aquino administration, a number of community journalists have also been threatened, sued for libel on the flimsiest grounds, barred from attending interviews and press conferences, and physically assaulted. In a recent incident, unidentified persons also burned a Catholic Church-owned radio station in Occidental Mindoro. All are indicative of a state of mind among those who want to silence the press that could, in the present circumstances, lead to murder.

And yet, except for increasing the budget of the Witness Protection Program and reforming the National Prosecution Services, the Aquino administration has taken almost none of the steps agreed upon in the August2010 meeting between media advocacy and journalists’ organizations and his communication group and the department of justice as necessary to stop the killings.  Among these steps were Malacañang support for changes in the rules of court to speed up the judicial process, and the inclusion of media representatives in the formation of Quick Response Teams to immediately investigate the killing of journalists and assure the preservation of evidence in the crime site.

After his pledge in his 2010 SONA to prosecute murderers, Mr. Aquino has been surprisingly silent when it comes to both extrajudicial killings and the killing of journalists.  A statement from him each time anyone, whether activist or journalist,  is murdered declaring his displeasure over the failure of the police to prevent it, and ordering immediate police action, could prod the police to greater efficiency and  warn the would–be killers  that things have changed since the Arroyo regime,  and they will now be prosecuted. Mr. Aquino has also yet to dismantle the private armies, despite their role in the November 23 massacre and in a number of other cases of political and journalists’ murders in other parts of the country.

Only by demonstrating that the killers and would-be killers of journalists and political activists, human rights workers, students, judges, lawyers, and others who have been targeted in the Philippines can no longer get away with murder can the killings stop, and begin the process of dismantling the culture of impunity.   That only ten cases involving the killing of journalists and almost none in the abduction, torture and murder of political activists have resulted in convictions since 1986 encourages the continuing killing of journalists and others in the Philippines.    That much has been known to the national and international human rights, press freedom and media watch groups since 2003, when they found that the media and political killings had become so much a part of the Philippine environment because of the weaknesses of the justice system in the communities.

That awareness did not prevent the international press, free expression and media advocacy groups from being shocked when the Ampatuan Massacre, which included 26 non-journalists, occurred.  They have declared November 23, 2009  the International Day to End Impunity not only to emphasize the  global significance of what happened to journalists and media workers on that date, but also to call attention to the imperative of stopping  political killings as well as the murder of journalists.

Has the Aquino administration surrendered even before the battle has begun? Is it that self-fulfilling prophecy that’s driving the Aquino government’s inability and apparent unwillingness to take the steps necessary to dismantle the culture of impunity so as to stop the killings that since 1986 have made widows, widowers and orphans of hundreds of Filipinos?

A United Front in Fighting Impunity: A video produced by CMFR for IFEX

Written by CMFR on November 23, 2011 – 8:20 am -

In commemoration of the 2nd year since the Ampatuan Massacre and the first International Day to End Impunity, the Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility produced a short video on how press freedom advocates and journalists’ groups responded to the Massacre in November 2009.  This video was produced with support from the International Freedom of Expression Exchange. Watch the video below:

Invitation to Cover
‘Trail of Impunity’

Written by CMFR on November 22, 2011 – 2:56 pm -

Center for Media Freedom and Responsibility (CMFR)
Freedom Fund for Filipino Journalists (FFFJ)
22 November 2011

Invitation to Cover and Join
11.23.2011
International Day to End Impunity (IDEI) and Second Anniversary of the Ampatuan Massacre

Who:
National and international media organizations led by the CMFR, FFFJ, National Union of Journalists of the Philippines, International Federation of Journalists, and multisectoral support groups

What:
Roadshow to End Impunity with the University of Santo Tomas Journalism Society and Communication Arts Students’ Association
Commemoration of the International Day to End Impunity and the Second Anniversary of the Ampatuan Massacre (32 of the 58 murdered were journalists/media workers)

When: November 23 (Wednesday), 12:30 p.m. to 7 p.m.

Where:
• UST Tan Yan Kee Student Center Audio Visual Room

• From UST along Espana Avenue to Mendiola Bridge

A trail of impunity will be left during the march: outlines of bodies will be drawn on the streets to depict the continued killings.

At the foot of Mendiola bridge, leaders from the media and concerned sectors are enjoined to help trace more bodies in chalk until the ‘crime scene’ surrounded by yellow police tape is filled.

Please wear black.

Schedule:
12:30 p.m. Roadshow to End Impunity (UST Tan Yan Kee Student Center AVR)
3:00 p.m. Assembly at UST
4:00 p.m. March to FEU along Morayta Avenue
4:30 p.m. Short program in front of FEU
5:00 p.m. Start of the ‘Trail of Impunity’ towards Mendiola Bridge
5:45 p.m. Continuation of ‘Trail of Impunity’ and lighting of candles for all victims of impunity

International Day to End Impunity in the Philippines



Want to subscribe?

 Subscribe in a reader Or, subscribe via email:
Enter your email address:  
Find entries :